Top line contracting.
−1.6% YoY versus +9.5% prior. 3y CAGR +8.3%.
−1.6%We use cookies
MainRatios uses cookies for essential site functions. With your consent, we also use analytics cookies including session replay sampling (PostHog, Google Analytics) and advertising cookies (Google AdSense). You can reject non-essential cookies, including the "sale" or sharing of personal information under CCPA, and you may withdraw consent at any time (GDPR). See our Privacy Policy for details.
All analysis on this page is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Fair values are model-based estimates. Always do your own research.
The Question
Energy earnings are a leveraged bet on the crude price, so the macro signal here is the whole thesis. After a war premium pushed WTI and Brent up more than ~45% since the late-February conflict began, crude has retraced toward the mid-$80s — roughly 20% off the 2026 peak — on growing odds of an Iran de-escalation.
The smoking-gun datapoint: a reported 14-point draft agreement would lift oil sanctions and commit Tehran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz within roughly 30 days, with one U.S. official putting the odds of a signed deal around 85%. If that transit chokepoint reopens, the supply-disruption premium embedded in the curve unwinds quickly.
Forward read (1-2 quarters): integrated majors and E&Ps see revenue and free cash flow track lower with realized prices. The earnings sensitivity is direct — a $10 move in the average realized barrel flows almost entirely to pre-tax profit on already-producing volumes, since the cost base is largely fixed. Buyback pace and dividend coverage tighten at the margin if crude settles below the level that underwrote 2026 capital-return plans.
Counter-narrative: the deal is not signed, Tehran has pushed back on terms, and any breakdown re-arms the Hormuz premium overnight. Several analysts still model crude holding near $90-100 until there is genuine clarity, which would keep energy cash flows resilient. This is a probability-weighted setup, not a one-way trade — hence medium confidence.
−1.6% YoY versus +9.5% prior. 3y CAGR +8.3%.
−1.6%Net margin 9.4% versus 12.3% prior (−2.9pp). Operating 15.3%.
9.4%P/E 24.2x — 27% above the 5y median of 19.0x. Forward 21.2x hints at EPS expansion next year.
24.2xBottom line: SLB splits the legendary model — 0 BUY, 1 HOLD, 0 AVOID, but earns a C sector grade (59/100) in Energy. Use the per-tab analysis to form your own view. Drill into the valuation breakdown and sector ranking for the full picture.
Investor verdicts vary by methodology. Full breakdown by investor and signal is in the valuation tab.
SLB's earnings calendar and history are tracked in the financials tab. Specific dates depend on company-published guidance.
SLB is in the Energy sector. Sector ranking and peer comparison are in the sector tab.
0 of 6 legendary investor models rate SLB a BUY. Fair value estimates and full investor breakdown are in the valuation tab.
SLB N.V.'s fair value depends on which model you trust. See the per-investor fair-value table in the valuation tab.
SLB trades at 21.0x earnings. Sector context and per-investor signals are in the valuation tab.
Concerns — SLB N.V.'s 12.8% ROE is below sector median.
Financial story
Concerns — SLB N.V.'s 12.8% ROE and 1.06 debt-to-equity warrant a closer look at the underlying business.
How does SLB compare?
See exactly where SLB ranks
Sign in to unlock the full sector ranking — free.
Sign in to see the rankingSLB sits at #7 in Energy with a C grade (59/100).