Top line contracting.
−1.4% YoY versus +17.0% prior. 3y CAGR +22.1%.
−1.4%We use cookies
MainRatios uses cookies for essential site functions. With your consent, we also use analytics cookies including session replay sampling (PostHog, Google Analytics) and advertising cookies (Google AdSense). You can reject non-essential cookies, including the "sale" or sharing of personal information under CCPA, and you may withdraw consent at any time (GDPR). See our Privacy Policy for details.
Financial Services · Market Cap: $313.5B
Fundamentals as of 2026-03-31
All analysis on this page is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Fair values are model-based estimates. Always do your own research.
The Question
Concerns — The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s 14.7% ROE is below sector median.
Financial story
Concerns — The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s 14.7% ROE and 15.76 debt-to-equity warrant a closer look at the underlying business.
Bottom line: GS is flagged as overvalued by the 1 legendary model, but earns a D sector grade (40/100) in Financial Services. Use the per-tab analysis to form your own view. Drill into the valuation breakdown and sector ranking for the full picture.
Strength. Return on tangible equity hit 21.3% and the stock trades near three times tangible book — a franchise the market spent a decade pricing at or below book is suddenly valued like a durable compounder. What changed isn't the trading floor; it's where the next dollar of revenue is meant to come from.
Risk. Every published analyst target sits below the $1,063 quote — the average lands near $945 — yet the shares hold a record-tier multiple on a quarter management's own guidance fades roughly 20% into mid-year. The distance between a peak print and a run-rate is the part the price leaves unanswered.
Because the market now expects a near-21% return on tangible equity to last. Goldman reported a 21.3% annualized return on tangible equity in Q1 2026 against a tangible book value of $336 a share, and a bank that sustainably earns that much is mathematically worth well above one times its book. For most of 2011–2016 the stock traded near or below book — about 0.75x in early 2012 — so the move to roughly 3.2x reflects a genuine re-rating from cyclical trader to durable compounder.
Goldman posted $17.23 billion in net revenues, $5.63 billion in net income and diluted EPS of $17.55 — the second-highest quarter in the firm's history, up about 24% from a year earlier. The engine was Global Banking & Markets at a record $12.74 billion, with equities trading a record $5.33 billion (+27%) and investment-banking fees up 48% to $2.84 billion, partly offset by fixed income falling 10% to $4.01 billion. Asset & Wealth Management added $4.08 billion on record $3.7 trillion of assets under supervision.
Above every one of them. At about $1,063 the stock sits above the ~$945 average analyst target and above the entire published range, which runs roughly $700 to $1,050 across 25 analysts. Even the most bullish call — Bank of America's $1,050 — sits just under the price, and JPMorgan holds a cautious $900. In plain terms, the market has priced the shares beyond where Goldman's own sell-side coverage values them — the price discounts a more permanent re-rating than the analysts are willing to underwrite.
Cyclicality — the record quarter is not a run-rate. Q1's $17.55 EPS was a near-record, yet consensus has the next two quarters fading toward roughly $13.5–$14, a step-down of about 20%. The quarter leaned on the most mean-reverting dollars Goldman earns: a hot equities tape (+27%) and a 48% jump in M&A advisory, while fixed income missed by roughly $830 million. Pay about 19 times trailing earnings and you are paying a peak multiple on a peak number the Street expects to be lower.
By building a fee engine and shrinking its riskiest balance sheet. Asset & Wealth Management reached a record $3.7 trillion of assets under supervision with management fees up 14% to about $3.1 billion — recurring, capital-light revenue — across a 33rd straight quarter of long-term inflows. Goldman also cut on-balance-sheet principal investments more than 90%, from roughly $64 billion toward $6 billion, and exited consumer banking as the Apple Card moves to JPMorgan. Each step trades volatile principal risk for steadier fees.
Goldman now screens between them on book value. At roughly 3.2x tangible book, GS trades above JPMorgan's ~3.0x and below Morgan Stanley's ~4.3x, a striking shift from the decade it traded at a discount to both. The market still awards Morgan Stanley the richest book multiple for its ~$7.5 trillion wealth platform, while JPMorgan carries the lowest P/E (~15.6x) for its steadier universal-bank earnings. Goldman's re-rating has pulled it toward the quality end of the group rather than the cyclical one.
How does GS compare?

| Firm | Target | Upside | vs. price | Rating | Recent move | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BS BofA Securities Ebrahim Poonawala | $1050 | −4% | Buy | cut 1,100 → 1,050 after Q1 2026 (Street high) | Apr 14 | |
CR CICC Research | $980 |
| −11% |
| Outperform |
| raised |
| May 19 |
UG UBS Group Erika Najarian | $940 | −14% | Neutral | raised | May 6 |
![]() Citigroup Keith Horowitz | $930 | −15% | Neutral | raised 765 → 930 | May 8 |
JP JPMorgan Kian Abouhossein | $900 | −18% | Neutral | raised 826 → 900 | Jun 12 |
MS Morgan Stanley | $854 | −22% | Equal Weight | raised 706 → 854 | Apr 15 |
SA Street low (aggregated) | $700 | −36% | Hold | current Street low; stale $373 BMO (Jul 2024) discarded as outlier | Jun 15 |
See exactly where GS ranks
Sign in to unlock the full sector ranking — free.
Sign in to see the rankingGS sits at #131 in Financial Services with a D grade (40/100).