Top line decelerating.
+48.8% YoY versus +61.6% prior. 3y CAGR +6.7%.
+48.8%We use cookies
MainRatios uses cookies for essential site functions. With your consent, we also use analytics cookies including session replay sampling (PostHog, Google Analytics) and advertising cookies (Google AdSense). You can reject non-essential cookies, including the "sale" or sharing of personal information under CCPA, and you may withdraw consent at any time (GDPR). See our Privacy Policy for details.
Technology · Market Cap: $1.28T
Fundamentals as of 2025-08-28
All analysis on this page is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Fair values are model-based estimates. Always do your own research.
The Question
Bottom line: MU currently has no legendary investor models qualifying — see /stock/MU/valuation for the per-model breakdown, but earns a C sector grade (45/100) in Technology. Use the per-tab analysis to form your own view. Drill into the valuation breakdown and sector ranking for the full picture.
Yes — Micron Technology, Inc.'s 15.8% ROE ranks above the S&P 500 median, and D/E 0.53 stays within healthy bounds.
Financial story
Yes — Micron Technology, Inc.'s 15.8% ROE shows strong capital efficiency, and its 0.53 debt-to-equity stays within healthy bounds.
Strength. HBM sold out through 2026 under multi-year contracts; DRAM ASPs +65%, NAND +77% — a 74% gross margin the bulls call structural, not a peak.
Risk. A cyclical memory maker at a 74% peak margin and ~41x trailing earnings; every prior cycle reverted, and the average analyst target sits below the price.
How does MU compare?
See exactly where MU ranks
Sign in to unlock the full sector ranking — free.
Sign in to see the rankingMU sits at #114 in Technology with a C grade (45/100).
Investor verdicts vary by methodology. Full breakdown by investor and signal is in the valuation tab.
MU's earnings calendar and history are tracked in the financials tab. Specific dates depend on company-published guidance.
MU is in the Technology sector. Sector ranking and peer comparison are in the sector tab.
0 of 6 legendary investor models rate MU a BUY. Fair value estimates and full investor breakdown are in the valuation tab.
Micron Technology, Inc.'s fair value depends on which model you trust. See the per-investor fair-value table in the valuation tab.
MU trades at 49.7x earnings. Sector context and per-investor signals are in the valuation tab.
+48.8% YoY versus +61.6% prior. 3y CAGR +6.7%.
+48.8%Net margin 22.8% versus 3.1% prior (+19.7pp). Operating 26.4%.
22.8%P/E 40.8x — 90% above the 5y median of 21.4x. Forward 18.2x hints at EPS expansion next year.
40.8xStructural-shift event, not a quarterly print. The marginal-dollar analysis: $650B incremental 2026 hyperscaler capex MUST land somewhere in the semiconductor supply chain — semis don't produce demand exogenously, they are derivative-demand from compute spend. WSTS projects industry revenue at ~$975B (+26% YoY), Bank of America's Vivek Arya models closer to 30%, which would cross the $1T threshold for the first time in history. Both estimates are anchored on SEC-filed capex commitments, not analyst speculation.
The smoking gun is the pace of upward revision — among the fastest in semiconductor-cycle history. Consensus 2026 hyperscaler capex moved from ~$465B at the start of Q3 2025 earnings season to ~$527B by the end of the calls, then pushed toward $650B within weeks. Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta account for roughly 80% of incremental dollar flow. What makes 2026 different is composition: the marginal dollar is shifting from pure merchant GPUs toward custom silicon (Google TPU, Meta MTIA), high-bandwidth memory (HBM3E sold out through 2026), and advanced packaging capacity. This composition shift rewires who captures the margin.
Forward implication: the picks-and-shovels trade has rotated one tier downstream from accelerators to memory and wafer-fab equipment. Memory is the sleeper trade — HBM3E pricing power has returned to the memory oligopoly for the first time since 2018 cycle peak, with MU contract pricing locked in well in advance. The equipment trio (AMAT, LRCX, KLAC) sits at ~28x forward earnings with backlogs extending into 2027 and less single-customer concentration than accelerator vendors. Power is now the binding constraint, not chip supply — interconnection queue times in several US grid regions exceed four years, and transformer lead times have blown out from months to years. This makes LIN (industrial gas), nuclear utilities, and grid infrastructure unconventional AI trades.
Counter-narrative: the Chanos circular-revenue critique — OpenAI raises money, spends it on MSFT Azure compute, MSFT justifies larger NVDA orders, NVDA invests back into OpenAI — resembles late-1990s telecom vendor financing. The counter: today's hyperscalers collectively produce hundreds of billions in operating cash flow annually; they can fund capex out of internally generated cash without stretching the balance sheet. The real Q2-Q3 risk is forward, not backward: the first hyperscaler to cut 2027 capex growth guidance by even 10% on a call would reprice the entire semiconductor complex overnight. That's the scenario every long-only semi fund manager is quietly stress-testing — but it hasn't happened, and the Q1 + confirmed 2026 capex commitments captured by this news event remain unambiguously bullish.